All analyses
AI analysis

Capital Alliance PLC: research report

Fairly valuedbearishSep 20, 2026

Evidence points bearish because CALT moved to a LKR 2.8 billion quarterly loss and equity fell sharply. The offset is a 26.0% trailing dividend yield, but the current loss leaves its basis unclear.

Reports without a focus are public, one per stock per day. Generation usually takes about 15 minutes, and we'll notify you when it's ready.

Why bearish

  • The June quarter swung from a LKR 1.4 billion profit to a LKR 2.8 billion loss, reversing the earnings base behind the shares.
  • Equity fell to LKR 8.3 billion from LKR 15.8 billion a year earlier, reducing the capital buffer supporting its capital-markets activities.

Against this. The trailing dividend yield is 26.0%, although the latest loss makes the payout's underlying earnings support unclear.

Operating margin
104.5%sector 40.4%
from 90.4% a year earlier
Net margin
104.5%sector 17.8%
from 64.7% a year earlier, revenue -223.7%
Return on equity
-26.4%
twelve months to Jun 30, 2026, unaudited
P/B
1.71sector 0.94
book Rs 25.23 per share
Dividend yield
27.84%sector 2.16%
trailing twelve months

Current figures, updated daily from filings to Jun 30, 2026. The report below was written on Sep 20, 2026. Sector figures are the median of 54 listed companies in the same sector.

Overview

Capital Alliance operates investment banking, broking, primary-dealer and fixed-income activities in Sri Lanka through a single company. The key change is a sharp reversal in trading performance: the June quarter moved into a substantial loss, while the balance-sheet equity supporting the business also contracted materially.

Price performance

The share closed at LKR 46.10 on 18 September 2026, down 10.7% over three months against a 5.9% fall in the ASPI. Over one year it fell 22.4% while the ASPI gained 0.7%, so CALT's decline has been markedly worse than the wider market's over both periods.

The close sat at the bottom of its 52-week range and 29.1% below its high. Recent 60-day volatility was 57.1% below its own one-year norm, while trading volume ran 11.1% above the preceding 60-day pace.

The three-year record shows one fall of 15% or more, the deepest 49%, which has not yet recovered. Median daily turnover was LKR 1.2 million; a LKR 1 million order is about 86% of what trades on a typical day, a large part of a day's trading.

Valuation

CALT has no meaningful P/E because trailing earnings are negative. Its P/B is 1.83 times, meaning the market price is LKR 1.83 for every rupee of net assets, versus the finance-sector median of 0.86 times. It sits at the 85th percentile of 53 peers on P/B, placing its book-value price toward the expensive end of the sector despite the recent erosion of equity.

The 26.0% dividend yield ranks highest among the 35 sector peers with a yield, but the dividend record does not show a simple rising payout: DPS was LKR 25.50 in FY2024 and LKR 16.00 in FY2026. The company's own multiple history cannot be compared because its book series does not reconcile to the page P/B and there is no consecutive four-quarter earnings record.

News and sentiment

Direct coverage was normal, with two material articles in the past 90 days, both classified neutral. The material item reported on 18 May was LKR 3.6 billion of related-party commercial-paper borrowings at 10%, maturing on 12 June, arranged for liquidity support.

A 20 September article reported Fitch's affirmation and subsequent commercial withdrawal of ratings for an investment-grade fund managed within the CAL group. The item does not provide a quantified effect on CALT's earnings or capital.

Financials

The June quarter swung from a LKR 1.4 billion profit a year earlier to a LKR 2.8 billion loss, a LKR 4.2 billion adverse movement. Revenue also moved from LKR 2.2 billion to negative LKR 2.7 billion, so the reported margin percentages are not a conventional measure of profitability in this quarter.

Gross margin was not supplied for either period. Operating margin was 104.5% versus 90.4% a year earlier, while net margin was 104.5% versus 64.7%; both were calculated against a negative revenue line. June has been the strongest quarter for net margin on average over the four complete years on record, and the latest net-margin reading was the best of five comparable June quarters, but that ranking does not alter the absolute loss.

There was no difference between operating and net loss in the June quarter, so below-the-line items did not drive the result. Equity was LKR 8.3 billion, down from LKR 15.8 billion a year earlier, while the share count remained 329.4 million; the loss therefore reduced the net assets underpinning each existing share without a share-count change.

Risks

The principal risk is the reduced capital buffer against a highly leveraged financial-services balance sheet. Total liabilities were 6.58 times equity at the March year-end, up from 6.32 times a year earlier, and June equity had fallen to LKR 8.3 billion. For a primary dealer and fixed-income operator, that leaves less owner capital relative to the obligations used in its business.

Liquidity is also a live concern given the LKR 3.6 billion related-party borrowing reported in May for liquidity support. Sector conditions add uncertainty: as at 20 September, Treasury bill yields had risen after an earlier decline and government-bond yields were volatile, affecting funding benchmarks and treasury-book valuations across the finance sector.

Outlook

As at 20 September 2026, the next decisive event is the interim filing for the quarter ending 30 September 2026, expected between 6 and 14 November. It will show whether the June loss and reduced equity were a one-quarter dislocation or continued pressure on the firm's capital-markets and treasury operations. The available data cannot identify the source of the negative revenue line or quantify the earnings effect of the reported liquidity support.

About this report. Generated on Sep 20, 2026 from market data up to Sep 18, 2026, 2 material news articles over 90 days and financials to Jun 30, 2026, and scored 44 of 100 on value (fairly valued) when it was written. Every figure is drawn from EquityLK's own data on this company. AI research can contain errors, so treat it as a starting point, not investment advice.

Previous reports